State v. Lawyer
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUTIERREZ, Judge.
Daniel J. Lawyer appeals from his judgment of conviction for felony driving under the influence (DUI). Specifically, he contends there was insufficient evidence to sustain the enhanced charge and that the court abused its discretion in imposing sentence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Lawyer was charged with one count of driving under the influence, I.C. § 18-8004(l)(a), with a felony enhancement due to the allegation that he had previously been convicted of felony DUI within the preceding fifteen years, I.C. § 18-8005(7) 1 The case proceeded…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. OliverIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. ReinkeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Martin Edmo IshIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. David Loren CurryIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. Jerry Lee McClainIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
- State of Idaho v. Braden Philip LaneIdaho Court of Appeals · 2026
- State v. David Loren CurryIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.