Legal Opinion · Dissent

Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 6, 2012No. 2011-1219Published

1Dissent

REYNA, Circuit Judge,

dissenting, with whom RADER, Chief Judge, joins in parts I — II, and with whom MOORE, O’MALLEY and WALLACH, Circuit Judges, join in full.

I dissent from the court’s refusal to consider en banc the proper standard of *1363review governing exceptional case determinations under 35 U.S.C. § 285. The majority decision is incorrect in presuming it appropriate for us to invade the fact finding province of the lower court.1 Sitting as a three judge panel, the Highmark majority shifts our standard of review from the deferential clear error standard to de novo review when assessing…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API