C. H. Pitt Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America

*386Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts:

I believe that the entertaining of declaratory judgment proceedings was properly for the discretion of the trial judge, and therefore I dissent.

It is an ongoing source of amazement to me that a májority of this Court can continue to ignore the explicit language of the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, ¡ Act of June 18, 1923, P. L. 840, §6, as amended, 12 P.S. §836, which should control this case. That statute provides in no uncertain terms that the availability of other relief, legal or equitable, “shall not debar a party from the privilege of…