Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 6, 2000No. CR-99-2414PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Shane Carpenter, appeals from the dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus, in which he attacks a prison disciplinary proceeding.

In processing this appeal, this Court realized that the trial court never ruled on Carpenter's affidavit of substantial hardship or his request to proceed in forma pauperis, see § 12-19-70, Ala. Code 1975, and that Carpenter never paid the docket fee in the circuit court. Because this issue affects the jurisdiction of the trial court to rule on the habeas corpus petition, we have, ex mero motu, noticed this defect in the proceedings.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Nunn v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. De-Gas, Inc. v. Midland ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Goldsmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Prince v. HunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Ex Parte McWilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. Madden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  5. Arrington v. Courtyard Citiflats, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API