State v. Ellis
Montana Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE SIMONTON,
dissenting.
¶88 I agree with Justice Leaphart’s dissent, and I feel the Court should take this opportunity to abandon the per se rule of State v. Schwarz, 2006 MT 120, 332 Mont. 243, 136 P.3d 989, for two reasons. First, it is inconsistent with Montana law and our analysis of consent-to-search cases. Rather than perpetuating bad law, the Court should *122use this opportunity to return to the totality of the circumstances approach. Secondly, holding that a child of thirteen may not invite officers into her home and may not give them evidence that supports her…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hembree v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
- State v. FolkensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- State v. LaceyMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. McLeesMontana Supreme Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.