Legal Opinion

Kvalheim v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 16, 1972No. 54773PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

Ruth Ann Hiimer and Henry Hiimer owned a Mercury car, which they insured with defendant insurer. The loss involves Mrs. Hiimer; hence she will be treated as the owner of the Mercury and as the insured.

*727Defendant’s policy protects various individuals as to various cars. Since Mrs. Hilmer was a named insured, no problem arises as to protection of the individual involved.

The policy has four parts plus “Additional Conditions.” Each of the four parts deals with a different kind of loss. Part I grants liability protection as to personal injuries and property damages for which Mrs.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stover v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. In re the Arbitration between American Casualty Co. & FosterNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lovato v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Gerardi v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Heinrich-Grundy v. Allstate InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Steel Products Co., Inc. v. Millers National Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Milwaukee Guardian Ins., Inc. v. TaraskaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API