Legal Opinion

Embry v. O'BANNON

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 2002No. 49A02-0112-CV-863PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RATLIFF, Senior Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Plaintiffs-Appellants Veronica Embry, Thomas G. Burns, George Nickas, and David Hoffman (the "Plaintiffs") appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Frank O'Bannon, in his official capacity as Governor of Indiana ("Governor O'Ban-non"), and Suellen Reed, in her official capacity as Superintendent of Public Instruction for the State of Indiana ("Superintendent Reed").

We affirm.

ISSUE

The following issue is dispositive: whether, as a matter of law, the Plaintiffs have standing as taxpayers to challenge the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Pence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. LeBrun v. ConnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Terre Haute Gas Corporation v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Common Cause v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BP Products North America Inc. v. Department of Local Government FinanceIndiana Tax Court · 2002
  2. Embry v. O'BANNONIndiana Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API