Legal Opinion

Barroll & Cannell v. Reading

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 15, 1821PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the orphans court of Cecil . r . county. The case is sufficiently stated m the court’s J N ° opinion. , ■

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Buchanan, J.

It appears in this case that an instrument of writing, *176purporting to be the last will and testament of Andrew f. Peterson, was exhibited in the orphans court of Cecil county, for probat, by the appellee* against which a caveat was entered by the appellants* and that pending the caveat, and after the depositions of several witnesses had been taken, an application was made to that court, on the part of the appellan ts, to direct a plenary proceeding by libel, and answer on oath, and to call a jury of twelve freeholders to their assistance*…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Pegg v. WarfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  3. Redman v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  4. Schmidt v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  5. Shealer v. StrakaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API