Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kilburn v. Guard

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1983No. 82-904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is brought from the grant of summary judgment by the trial court. Summary judgment is appropriate only when it appears from the record before the court that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Civ. R. 56(C). Here, plaintiff seeks a name clearing hearing to refute charges arising from the termination of his employment as chief of police. Such a name clearing hearing is mandated in certain circumstances by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. A civil action for damages is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Codd v. VelgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State ex rel. Trimble v. State Board of CosmetologyOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Neal v. TregliaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Merritt v. Canton Township Board of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Warthman v. Genoa Twp. Bd. of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Bedinghaus v. Village of MoscowClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 1987
  5. Shealy v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API