Legal Opinion

Vandal v. Leno

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 2014No. 20130301PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Sheena Leno, now known as Sheena Mittleider, appealed from a district court order denying her expedited motion to reopen the record, and from a judgment awarding Adam Vandal primary residential responsibility of the parties’ minor child, L.V. We affirm, concluding the district court’s decision to award primary residential responsibility to Vandal was not clearly erroneous. We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Leno’s request to reopen the record.

I

[¶ 2] Leno and Vandal were never married. Their relationship began…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Steckler v. StecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Marsden v. KoopNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Dieterle v. DieterleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Leno v. EhliNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Law v. WhittetNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Innis-Smith v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Eubanks v. FisketjonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Yanjun Zuo v. Yuanyuan WangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Williams v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API