Legal Opinion

G & S Development Corp. v. Seitlin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 27, 2010No. 3D09-954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.

The plaintiff, G & S Development Corp. (“G & S”), appeals an order granting a Motion to Enforce Settlement (“Motion to Enforce”) filed by defendant Jack Seitlin (“Seitlin”), finding that the Second Addendum to Vacant Land Contract (“Second Addendum”) is enforceable. We affirm.

G & S filed an amended complaint against Jack Seitlin, as Trustee and Individually, and Pepper Family, LLC (“Pepper”), seeking specific performance of a real estate contract entered into by G & S (buyer) and Seitlin, as Trustee (seller). Pursuant to a Co-Tenants Agreement, Seitlin is named as Trustee of the real property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spiegel v. H. Allen Holmes, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Whelan v. WhelanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. SOUTH FLA. APT. ASSOC., INC. v. DansyearDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Chaiken v. SuchmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Agostino v. Ramirez Super Motors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Built Green Corp. v. Environ Condominium II, Association, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  3. DEVON A. BROWN v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  4. Sara Davidovich v. Jill LippoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API