Legal Opinion

Coulter v. Van Kriekan

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided May 22, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01619Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 PHILLIP COULTER, et al., Case No. 2:19-CV-1619 JCM (EJY) 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. 10 MONA VAN KRIEKAN, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is pro se plaintiffs Phillip Coulter and Shari Williams’s 14 (collectively “plaintiffs”) motion to dismiss their own complaint. (ECF No. 25). Defendants 15 Mona Van Krieken, Mike and Mo's Transport, Inc and Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc., 16 (collectively “defendants”) filed a response (ECF No. 26), to which plaintiffs did not reply. 17 Also before the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bias v. MoynihanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API