Shank v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). There are eighty-three assignments of error in the motion for a new trial, many of which are unimportant, and we only notice such as are insisted upon by appellant.
First, it is insisted that the trial court erred in calling jurors who had been summoned to serve on a previous case after the regular panel had been exhausted, it being claimed that the prospective jurors should have been summoned from the bystanders in accordance with the statute, § 3154, Crawford & Moses’ Digest. An accused person has no right to the services of a particular juror but only to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Harding v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.