Legal Opinion

Shank v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 1934No. Crim. 3878Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). There are eighty-three assignments of error in the motion for a new trial, many of which are unimportant, and we only notice such as are insisted upon by appellant.

First, it is insisted that the trial court erred in calling jurors who had been summoned to serve on a previous case after the regular panel had been exhausted, it being claimed that the prospective jurors should have been summoned from the bystanders in accordance with the statute, § 3154, Crawford & Moses’ Digest. An accused person has no right to the services of a particular juror but only to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Harding v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API