Legal Opinion

Singleton v. Cecil

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1998No. 97-1726PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

David Singleton appeals the District Court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the City of Advance, Chief of Police Don Cecil, and four Advance City Council members, on his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) that his termination as an Advance police officer violated his rights to free speech, association, privacy, and due process. After briefing and oral argument, we affirmed the judgment, one judge dissenting. See Singleton v. Cecil, 133 F.3d 631, 636 (8th Cir.1998). We then granted Mr. Singleton’s petition for rehearing, thus vacating the original panel…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Phillips v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. Singleton v. CecilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Tamela Muir v. Decatur County, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  4. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  5. United States v. IngramDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API