Legal Opinion
Hornell Brewing Co. v. Spry
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Louise Gruner Gans, J.
Plaintiff Hornell Brewing Co., Inc. (Hornell), a supplier and marketer of alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages, including the popular iced tea drink "Arizona”, commenced this action for a declaratory judgment that any rights of defendants Stephen A. Spry and Arizona Tea Products Ltd. to distribute Hornell’s beverages in Canada have been duly terminated, that defendants have no further rights with respect to these products, including no right to market and distribute them, and that any such rights previously transferred to defendants have reverted to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Bronze Corp. v. Streamway ProductsOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Ernest J. Michel & Co., Inc. v. Anabasis Trade, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- S & S, INC. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1991
- Phibro Energy, Inc. v. Empresa De Polimeros De Sines SarlDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Lorbrook Corp. v. G & T Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ED&F Man Sugar Inc. v. ZZY Distribs., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- thyssenkrupp Materials, LLC v. Triumph Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022