Baker v. Hines
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.
For the purpose of trial in the lower court, and also for the purpose of appeal, the above-styled actions were. consolidated, by agi eemeut of the parties thereto and by order of the trial court. The plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs below and defendant in error defendant below. '
The actions are for damages to the plaintiffs , individually. The acts on which the respective claims for damages are based occurred at the same time and place. The pleadings in the two actions are practically the same. The evidence is the same for each action. The trial proceedings are the same for each action. A…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dickson v. WaldronIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Dwinelle v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Gillingham v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
- Brill v. EddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Rand v. Butte Electric Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. IngramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Fullgraf v. Oklahoma Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. BolinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas Reilroad Company, a Corporation v. Gertrude Ingram and United States of America, Gertrude Ingram, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963