Singer v. 3675 Bird Road, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the trial court’s entry of final summary judgment. The criminal attack on appellants was not foreseeable; thus, as a matter of law, appellees had no duty to take steps to prevent its occurrence. See Lomillo v. Howard Johnsons Co., 471 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Admiral’s Port Condominium Assoc., Inc. v. Feldman, 426 So.2d 1054 (Fla.3d DCA), review denied, 434 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983); Chateloin v. Flanigan’s Enter., Inc., 423 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Badillo v. DeVivo, 161 Ill.App.3d 596, 113 Ill.Dec. 696, 515 N.E.2d 681, appeal denied, 117 Ill.2d 541, 115 Ill.Dec. 397, 517…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Badillo v. DeVivoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Admiral's Port Condominium Association, Inc. v. FeldmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Chateloin v. FLANIGAN'S ENTERPRISES INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Lomillo v. Howard Johnsons CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- GOVT. EMP. INS. COMPANY v. WrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Beckler v. HoffmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Miller v. Armour Industrial Security, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990