Legal Opinion

Tropicana Products, Inc. v. Shirley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 2, 1988No. 87-2788PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONOVER, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant challenges an adverse final judgment holding that it breached its contractual obligation to purchase fruit. The record reflects sufficient, competent evidence to support the trial court’s determination that the appellant, not the appellees, breached the contract in question.

The appellees’ act of selling a portion of their citrus grove to a third party did not constitute a breach of their obligation to provide fruit to the appellant. The appellees’ contract with the appellant “constructively severed” the fruit from the land before the appellees sold…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bornstein v. SomersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Bessemer Properties v. BarberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lazovitz, Inc. v. Saxon Construction, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. The Klett Organization, Architects, P.A., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Silvicraft, Inc. v. Southeast Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API