Legal Opinion
Mcdowell-Wellman Engineering Company v. Hartford Accident And Indemnity Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 30, 1983No. 82-1630PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
711 F.2d 521
McDOWELL-WELLMAN ENGINEERING COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and Lexington
Insurance Company and Rollins, Burdick and Hunter
of Pennsylvania, Inc., Appellees.
No. 82-1630.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Argued April 14, 1983.
Decided June 30, 1983.
John C. McNamara (argued), German, Gallagher & Murtagh, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Charles W. Craven (argued), Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Philadelphia, Pa., for Lexington Ins. Co.
Mark D. Alspach (argued), Krusen Evans & Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa., for Hartford Acc. and Indem.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cay Divers, Inc. v. RavenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987