Legal Opinion

McCaughn v. Philadelphia Barge Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1928No. 12356PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a suit by the United States upon a bond executed by the defendants, Philadelphia Barge Company and National Surety Company, as principal and surety, respectively. It now comes before the court upon a statutory demurrer to the statement of claim, in uniformity with the Pennsylvania Practice Act (Pa. St. 1920, §§ 17181-17204). The following facts are admitted:

In October, 1920, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed against the Philadelphia Barge Company an additional tax of $12,635 on account of its income for the year 1918. On February 15, 1921, the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  2. Roberts Sash & Door Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. United States v. RennoldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
  4. (PC) Seay v. California Department of Corrections/RehabilitationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Hudson v. DossmanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API