Thamann v. Bartish
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Sundermann, Judge.
Factual and Procedural History
{¶ 1} On Friday, January 26, 1996, Dr. Lawrence Bartish performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the decedent, twenty-three-year-old Meredith Thamann, to remove her gall bladder and some gall stones. Meredith was discharged from the hospital later that day. Over the weekend, Meredith was very lethargic and nauseous.
{¶ 2} By Monday, January 29, Meredith’s condition had worsened. She was vomiting profusely and was short of breath. That afternoon, Meredith’s husband, Brian Thamann, called Dr. Bartish. Dr. Bartish told Brian to take Meredith to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maggio v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Pesek v. University Neurologists Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Jones v. MacEdonia-northfield Banking Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Drake v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Kurzner v. SandersOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blair v. McDonaghOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Fehrenbach v. O'MalleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kassay v. Niederst Mgmt., Ltd., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
- Striff v. Luke Med. Practitioners, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Fahlbush v. Crum-JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.