Legal Opinion
Blagge v. Balch
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 13, 1896No. 177, 234, 207PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
162 U.S. 439 (1896)
BLAGGE
v.
BALCH.
BROOKS
v.
CODMAN.
FOOTE
v.
WOMEN'S BOARD OF MISSIONS.
Nos. 177, 234, 207.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued and submitted March 24, 25, 1896.
Decided April 13, 1896.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF NEW HAVEN, STATE OF CONNECTICUT.
Mr. George A. King (of Boston) for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Francis V. Balch and Mr. Felix Rackemann, for defendant in error.
Mr. William Warner Hoppin for plaintiffs in error in Foote v. Women's Board of Missions, No. 207, submitted on his brief.
Mr. James H.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Tillman v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Williams v. HeardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Jackson v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Swasey v. Jaques.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Price v. ForrestSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. KenneySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Aris Gloves, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Briggs v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Southern Pac. Co. v. De Valle Da CostaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1911
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.