Legal Opinion

More v. Shoemaker

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1967No. 8187PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHAVEZ, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the trial court dismissing appellants’ complaint under the provisions of Rule 41 (e) (§ 21-1-1 (41) (e), N.M.S.A., 19É3 Comp.), which provides that in any civil action, when it shall be made to appear to the court that the plaintiff has failed to take any action to bring such action to its final determination for a period of at least two years after the filing of said action, unless a written stipulation signed by all parties to said action has been filed suspending final action therein beyond two years, any party to such action may…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Featherstone v. HansonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Vigil v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. FitzgeraldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Western Timber Products Co. v. WS Ranch CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Briesmeister v. MedinaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baca v. BurksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. McClenithan ex rel. McClenithan v. LovatoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Baca v. BurksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API