Legal Opinion

United States v. Said

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 28, 2014No. Criminal Action No. 2:10cr57PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RAYMOND A. JACKSON, District Judge.

Before this Court is Defendants Mohamed Ali Said, Mohamed Abdi Jama, Ab-dicasiis Cabaase, Abdi Razaq Abshir Osman, and Mohamed Farah’s Joint Motion for Ruling Regarding Inapplicability of Statutory Mandatory Minimum Punishment for Piracy Offenses. Dkt. No. 245. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. The parties are DIRECTED to submit supplemental memo-randa addressing the sentence to be imposed for the piracy charge within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the date of entry of this Order.

I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Mohamed SaidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Mohamed SaidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API