Legal Opinion

Williams, Bax & Saltzman, P.C. v. Boley International (H.K.) Ltd

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 5, 2015No. 13-2434PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYKES, Circuit Judge.

The law firm of Williams, Bax & Saltz-man, P.C., represented Cole Goesel and his parents in a personal-injury suit that settled prior to trial. Because Cole was a minor, the law firm needed judicial approval to finalize the settlement. The parties’ contingent-fee agreement entitled the firm to one-third of the gross settlement, while all litigation expenses would be covered by the Goesels’ share.

The district court refused to approve the settlement unless litigation expenses were deducted off the top and one-third of the net settlement was allocated to the firm. The judge…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Richard Doermer v. Kathryn CallenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Dustan Dobbs v. George McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. CUNNINGHAM v. HCR MANORCARE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. Doe, John v. Highland Community SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  5. FARRIS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LPDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API