Legal Opinion

Threlkeld v. Christoph

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 23, 1984No. 0050PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

Appellant Threlkeld appeals from the order of the circuit court granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment in this action for damages for tortious interference with Threlkeld’s employment contract with respondent BigelowSanford. We affirm the order of the trial court.

Rule 44(c) of the Rules of Practice of the Circuit Court provides that the circuit court shall grant summary judgment if the pleadings and depositions, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is “no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. DeBerry v. McCainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Powell v. Bonitz Insulation Co. of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dutch Fork Development Group II v. Sel Properties, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Volvo Trademark Holding Aktiebolaget v. CLM EQUIP. COMPANY, INC.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
  3. Gecy v. S.C. Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  4. Todd v. SC FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INS. CO.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Hall v. UBS Financial Services Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API