Legal Opinion

Clapp v. LaGrill

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1899PublishedCited by 15 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Shélby County. L S- Galloway, L

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This is an action . for damages for personal injuries. It was tried before the Court and a jury, and a verdict and judgment rendered for $1,000 and cost, and defendant, Clapp, has appealed and assigned quite a number of errors. There is practically no contest as to the facts. . It appears that Hook and LaGrill occupied storehouse No. 283 on Second Street, in the city of Memphis, as tenants of Grosvenor and Clapp, who also owned No. 231 adjoining No. 233 on the north. No. 229, the next house on the north, was owned by the Livermore Foundry Company. These houses rvere constructed on the sgme…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Gibson v. LeonardIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Galveston Oil Co. v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co. v. CampagnaTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Park v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  3. Manning v. ShermanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
  4. Southern v. Cowan Stone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Williams v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API