People v. Yates
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The appellant was prosecuted on a complaint charging that wilfully and without lawful excuse he omitted “to furnish necessary food, clothing, shelter, and medical attendance for his minor child, 1 unborn, five months in gestation”. After trial by a jury he was found guilty and placed on probation. No judgment was pronounced against him, but his motion for a new trial was denied, and he appeals from the order denying this motion. *785He also made a motion in arrest of judgment, which was denied, and he appeals from this order also.
This ease requires a construction of the provisions of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Glassell Development Co. v. Citizens' Natlional Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. PettingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971