Legal Opinion

Hemphill v. Mississippi State Highway Commission

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1962No. 42348PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

This case concerns an executory interest in land, following a defeasible fee, but to shift to named takers only upon an uncertain event. The principal questions are whether the owners of this estate have a compensable interest in lands taken and allegedly damaged by the State Highway Commission for highway purposes, and whether and how such an interest is capable of evaluation. We hold that this particular exe-cutory interest is a compensable one under the constitutional provision guaranteeing compensation for property taken or damaged by the state, but pretermit for the present a decision on…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mississippi State Highway Commission v. HillmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Cannon v. BarryMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Charleston & Western Car. Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  4. Mississippi State Highway Commission v. TreasMississippi Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Matter of City of New York (Cropsey Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1935

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lawson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Brown v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. City of Tupelo, Mississippi v. John Patterson (Pat) O'CallaghanMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Stevenson v. StevensonMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bridgforth v. GrayMississippi Supreme Court · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API