Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Horstman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1992No. Nos. 23770-CA, 23771-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARVIN, Chief Judge.

We affirm a summary judgment in favor of the UM insurer of Anita Edwards that effectively declares that she was not covered under her UM policy for personal injuries she sustained when she, a guest passenger in a Chevrolet owned by another, was shot by a shotgun negligently or intentionally fired by a guest passenger in another vehicle that was racing the Chevrolet.

There is no genuine issue of any material fact. Kessler v. Amica Mutual Ins. Co., 573 So.2d 476 (La.1991); Slade v. Altex Ready-Mix Concrete Corp., 579 So.2d 1102 (La.App.2d Cir.1991). Foster v. Lafayette Ins.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kessler v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Foster v. Lafayette Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Slade v. Altex Ready-Mix Concrete Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. HorstmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Edwards v. HorstmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API