Legal Opinion

Wyndham Co. v. Wyndham Hotel Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Norman C. Ryp, J.

a. ISSUES

“Y”, as in “Wyndham”, is a crooked letter, consistent with its 1450 English origin, history, geography and genealogy! “I”, as in ‘Windham”, is a straight letter and self-possessive pronoun consistent with the parties’ battle for exclusive use of its name and mark in the middle east of Manhattan. The exclusive use of the Wyndham” (also known as Windham) name and mark are common, but competitive, objects in this complex intellectual property battle since 1992. It links a “world famous” family hotel, sited in Manhattan, with a north and central…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Arrow Fastener Co., Inc. v. The Stanley WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Allied Maintenance Corp. v. Allied Mechanical Trades, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Cadbury Beverages, Inc. v. Cott Corporation and Cott Beverages Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Estee Lauder Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. The Gap, Inc. D/B/A Old Navy Clothing Company, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pearson Education, Inc. v. KumarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Alexander Avenue Kosher Restaurant Corp. v. DragoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Clarion Associates, Inc. v. D.J. Colby Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Blaich Associates, Inc. v. Coach/Blaich Real Estate of Manhasset Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Caliko, SA v. Finn & Emma, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API