Torrey v. Toledo Portland Cement Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Bill by Orlando L. Torrey and others against the Toledo Portland Cement Company, William Watts, Charles M. Cooley, Randall T. Van Valkenburg, and others for the appointment of a receiver of defendant corporation, for an accounting, and for general relief. Prom the decree rendered, complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Defendant Watts demurred to the bill of complaint in this case. His demurrer wás overfilled. He appealed to this court. The action of the court below was sustained, and the case remanded for the framing of issue and hearing upon the merits. 150 Mich. 86 (113 N. W. 580). The hearing has been had and the bill dismissed as to defendants Watts and Cooley, and a decree rendered against defendant Van Valkenburg for $7,600. Complainants have appealed.
To the statement of the case in the former opinion should be added that the bill alleged that in the annual report of the corporation it was stated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Pietsch v. MilbrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Hinkley v. Sac Oil & Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Torrey v. Toledo Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Shipman v. Portland Const. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Boden v. RenihanMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Pikes Peak Co. v. PfuntnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Stroman v. Atlas Refining Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.