Legal Opinion · Dissent

Succession of Donohue

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1980No. 11127Published

1DissentSartain, Judge

I concur with the majority in that the exception of no cause of action was properly sustained. However, I disagree with the majority in its conclusion that the matter should not be remanded to permit an amendment to the pleadings. C.C.P. art. 934.

The record does not disclose that Mrs. Keller either requested an opportunity to amend or that the trial judge denied her the opportunity to do so.

In her brief in this court she contends that certain items of property listed in the inventory as belonging to the estate were acquired as the result of “her labor and investment.” This claim is an obvious…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hodges v. LaSalle Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Sparrow v. SparrowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  3. Keller v. KellerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Guerin v. BonaventureLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API