Legal Opinion

Scott v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Multnomah County. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

Tbe respondent commenced an action against the appellant, to recover damages for an injury received while in the appellant’s employ. The appellant is a railway corporation, operating a railroad in the State of Oregon, and was incorporated under the laws of the state. The respondent alleged in his complaint that on the 13th day of July, 1885, he was in the appellant’s employ as a switch-tender and car-coupler for hire, at Albina, Multnomah County, Oregon, and so remained in its employ up to the time of tbe commission of the grievance complained of; that on tbe 13th day of July, 1885, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gottlieb v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Kroy v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Grant v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Flannagan v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Knahtla v. Oregon Short Line, etc., Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Gentzkow v. Portland Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gorley v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  4. Tucker v. Northern Terminal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Leavitt v. StampOregon Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API