Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Russell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Branch. Trespass on the case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Russell obtained judgment against Cheney for ten dollars by reason of the latter’s dog injuring and partly devouring certain fresh meat. The amount of damages was agreed upon and Cheney told Russell he would pay for the meat if his dog did the mischief. The judgment was affirmed at the circuit on certiorari, and Cheney brings the case into this court.

A great many rather technical objections were raised before the justice, but upon certiorari none of them should be given any weight unless there is reason to believe they tended to a wrong result. The statute requires judgment to be given at the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bullock v. UeberrothMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Wattles v. MossMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Carver v. Detroit & Saline Plank-Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. RussMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API