Koppen v. Union Iron & Foundry Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. — Hon. W. B. Homer, Judge. (1) All money, rights, credits, etc., of a defendant in charge of or under control of the garnishee or owing by him from the time of the service of garnishment to the time of filing his answer, is subject to garnishment.” Sec. 2416, R. S. Mo. 1909; Dinkins v. Woodenware Co., 99 Mo. App. 310; Stevenson v. Machine Co., 150 Mo. App. 555; Bambrick v. Construction Co., 152 Mo. App. 69; Loomis v. Shriner, 165 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. — Hon. W. B. Homer, Judge. (1) All money, rights, credits, etc., of a defendant in charge of or under control of the garnishee or owing by him from the time of the service of garnishment to the time of filing his answer, is subject to garnishment.” Sec. 2416, R. S. Mo. 1909; Dinkins v. Woodenware Co., 99 Mo. App. 310; Stevenson v. Machine Co., 150 Mo. App. 555; Bambrick v. Construction Co., 152 Mo. App. 69; Loomis v. Shriner, 165 Mo. App. 25. (2) If any wages are due to a resident defendant from a garnishee from the time of ” the service of garnishment to…
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, P. J.
(after stating the facts). — - While admitting that the trial court decided correctly as to the first and second items as above, counsel for appellant challenge the correctness on the third, those counsel claiming the $1154 are subject to garnishment, and that, in addition to the $115.40, all of this, *78$1154 should have been adjudged to her. The argument for reversal rests upon two propositions: first, that under sections 2415 and 2416, Revised Statutes 1909, the exemption of wages extends to and covers only the wages earned and due for the thirty days next prior to the service of the summons,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bambrick v. Bambrick Bros. Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Dinkins v. Crunden-Martin Woodenware Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Davis v. MeredithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- In re PilgerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1902
- Bovard v. FordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kingman v. BanksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
- Texas Co. v. Asphalt Distributing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
- Wolf v. CommanderSupreme Court of Florida · 1939