Goldstein v. Harris
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Action by Gustave Goldstein against Simon D. Harris. On an order dissolving injunction, plaintiff applied for a suspensive appeal, and on denial of the same applied for writs ■ of certiorari and mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
The relator, alleging that he was the duly registered owner, under Act No. 49, p. 56, of 18,98, of the trade-name “Goodyear Raincoat Company,” and had under the same been conducting for several years a successful business in the city of New Orleans, sued out a writ of injunction in the civil district court of the parish of Orleans against Simon D. Harris, inhibiting and restraining Mm from using the name of the “Goodyear Raincoat Company in any manner whatever in the conduct of business.” The relator alleged in his petition that the use of said trade-name was worth to him in the conduct of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hyde v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
- State ex rel. A. Lehman & Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
- Park v. PorterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
- White & Trufant v. CazenaveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
- Comstock v. PaieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- O'Beirne v. Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Bradley v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Moses v. TraverseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1914
- State ex rel. Richard v. Judge Twenty-Eighth Judicial District CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1911