McDonald v. Seay
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
This is a' workmen’s compensation case. One of the issues submitted to the Industrial Board was whether or not the employer worked ten or more men regularly at the time of the ac cident. It was shown by the evidence of the employer himself that he had been engaged in operating a sawmill for eighteen months before the date of the accident. In answer to the question as to how many men he had regularly employed in this business, he answered: “Sometimes I have eight; sometimes I have ten. I have had as high as twelve.” In operating the mill he sometimes had eight, sometimes nine or ten, sometimes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. HunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Green v. BenedictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Jones v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fowler v. Baalmann, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Baratta's Italian Restaurant v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Newsome v. LoperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Harper v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.