Legal Opinion

Pandey v. Giri

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 20, 2006No. C.A. NO. 06-30109-MAPPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANTS’MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Dkt. Nos. 6, 8, 12, 14 & 32)

PONSOR, District Judge.

This case arises out of what Chief Magistrate Neiman has rightly described as “a soured agreement for an arranged marriage.” Dkt. No. 32 at 1. Plaintiff has sued Lallan and Kanti Giri (“the Giris”) for falsely representing that their niece in India would be an appropriate spouse for Plaintiffs son, Pranjul. He has. also sued Lallan’s employer in Maryland, Emergent Biosolutions, the Giris’ former attorney Matthew Hertz, and a Maryland-based…

2Cases cited29 opinions

Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Grice v. VIM Holdings Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017