Legal Opinion

Suddath v. Calhoun & Calhoun

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1931No. 21130PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A note payable to a named payee, and not to “bearer,” or to “order,” is not a negotiable instrument; as a note payable to “Vineland, Ine., a corporation by and under the laws of Georgia.” The *150transferee of the note, even though he acquired it for value and before maturity, took it subject to all existing defenses which the maker may have had against the payee.

Decided October 3, 1931. Oliver & Oliver, for plaintiff in error. Connerat & Hunter, contra.

2. Where suit on a note given for the purchase-price of stock in a corporation to be afterwards formed was brought by the transferee of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Felton v. Highlands Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Keating v. Woods-Young Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adair v. ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Behrens v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API