Legal Opinion

In re Michael H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 1997Published

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

After a fact-finding hearing, Family Court rendered a bench decision finding that respondent was a person in need of supervision. Subsequently, a dispositional order was entered suspending judgment for one year upon certain conditions. Respondent appeals.

*619Initially, we note that respondent’s appeal from the order of disposition brings up for review the fact-finding order (see, Matter of Herbert RR., 214 AD2d 891, 892, n; Matter of Herbert TT., 192 AD2d 916, 917). We further note that, although the dispositional order is moot because the suspended judgment has expired (see, Matter of Demetrius…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Herbert RR.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re Herbert TT.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re Demetrius X.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. In re Erik P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. In re Tabitha LL.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API