Legal Opinion
Prescott v. County of El Dorado
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 1, 2002No. 01-15913PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
This case was before us previously, when we held, inter alia, that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge an indemnification provision in a collective bargaining agreement. Prescott v. County of El Dorado, 177 F.3d 1102, 1112(9th Cir.1999) (Prescott I). That provision requires the union to hold the employer harmless from any liability arising out of the collection of agency fees from non-union members of the bargaining unit. Id. Plaintiffs are nonunion members of an agency shop bargaining unit employed by defendant El Dorado County, California.
The Supreme…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Los Angeles v. Santa Monica BayKeeperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cummings v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Locke v. KarassDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Prescott v. County of El DoradoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002