Legal Opinion

State v. Harwood

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1972No. 10712PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of a misdemeanor. Appellant-defendant Harwood was found guilty of having had in his possession a game animal, specifically a mountain goat, taken in an area outside that specified in his permit in violation of IC. § 36-805. The trial court imposed a fine of $300 and a fifteen day sentence in the county jail. We reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial.

Of appellant’s assignments of error, we need consider only two. First, that a portion of the carcass of a mountain goat was seized from appellant’s motor vehicle…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State v. AragonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Paradis v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. WooleryIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API