Legal Opinion

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vallendingham

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 28, 1950No. Civ. A. 3372-49PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This case involves a very interesting point as to the liability of an employer who carries workmen’s compensation insurance, with respect to an injury sustained by one of his employees in the course of his employment. In this case the injured employee elected to accept compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq. The insurance carrier, however, by way of subrogation brought suit against two third parties whose negligence is claimed to have contributed to the injury. The defendants then brought in the employer as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc. v. Rukert Terminal Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jerome S. Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Otto T. Schwab v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  3. Noland Company, Incorporated, and Third-Party and Cross-Appellant v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Company, Third-Party and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  4. Allen & Whalen, Inc. v. John C. Grimberg Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Nyquist v. BatcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API