Legal Opinion

State v. Pickering

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1982No. 13510PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Justice.

Appellant, Michael D. Pickering, was charged and convicted of kidnapping under SDCL 22-19-1(3). We affirm on his appeal.

Appellant raises two issues, both claiming the trial court erred in refusing his proffered instructions on lesser included offenses. We recently reviewed the South Dakota law governing lesser included offense instructions in State v. Oien, 302 N.W.2d 807, 808-809 (S.D.1981):

Under the law as established in this state, it is incumbent upon the trial court to instruct the jury, if requested, upon a lesser offense included in the offense charged if the evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KafkaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. OienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. KarasekMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State v. CrofuttSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Ellis v. ArcherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. CookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. WaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. BlackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. AngleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. State v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API