Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Human Biostar, Inc. v. Celltex Therapeutics Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 2017No. 14-15-00234-CVPublished

1ConcurrenceMartha Hill Jamison, Justice

I concur with the majority’s disposition of this case but respectfully disagree with its analysis in several areas, particularly concerning whether Biostar’s appeal should be analyzed under the requirements for an ordinary or a restricted appeal.1

The Restricted Appeal

As the majority acknowledges, Biostar filed a notice of restricted appeal and thereafter briefed this court based on the requirements applicable to restricted appeals. Biostar did not file a notice for, or otherwise pursue, an ordinary appeal. Nonetheless, the majority construes and analyzes Biostar’s appeal as an ordinary appeal.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. George Alexander D/B/A Zentner's Daughter Steakhouse v. Lynda's BoutiqueTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. General Electric Co. v. Falcon Ridge Apartments, Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Jason R. Searcy, as Trustee of the Exempt Assets Trust v. Parex Resources, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Texaco, Inc. v. Central Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lawyers Lloyds v. WebbTexas Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API