Legal Opinion

Poulsom v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1925No. 24497PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant prosecutes error from a conviction had in the district court for Otoe county on an information charging a violation of section 9616, Comp. St. 1922, as amended by chapter 91, Laws 1923, in that defendant received and had in his possession an automobile, knowing the same to have been stolen.

The information contains no allegation which, either directly or indirectly, alleges that defendant received or had the car in his possession in Otoe county.

At the opening of the trial defendant filed a general demurrer to the information, which was overruled by the *768court. The correctness of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Dunn v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Fussell v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McCoy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SteinerColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. FurstenauNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Langford v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  5. People v. SteinerColorado Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API