Legal Opinion

Carrol Mercantile Co. v. Folmar

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Pike Law Court. Heard before Hon. T. L. Borum. Trover by W. B. Folmar against the J. S. Carroll Mercantile Company for a bale of cotton. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPelham, P. J.

This suit was for the conversion of a bale of cotton, and was tried on the issues made under a plea of the general issue.(1) The evidence showed that during the year 1913 one Miller raised the bale of cotton in controversy in the course of his farming operations; that in January, 1913, Miller executed-a mortgage to W. B. Folmar, the appellee (plaintiff below), covering his crop for that year, including the bale in suit, which was designated by the marks “J-94.” This mortgage was duly recorded in the probate office of the county during the same month, on, to-wit, January 16, 1914.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stickney v. Dunaway & LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Brooks v. Greil Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Chadwick v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Chapman v. First Nat. Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Williams v. ViningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hattemer v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Dutton v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API