Legal Opinion

Wold v. City of Boulder

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 9, 1932No. 12,705PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court and are hereinafter designated as there, or as Mrs. Wold, and the city, respectively.

Mrs. Wold was injured by falling on an icy sidewalk, and sued- the city for damages. A jury returned a verdict against her and to review the judgment thereupon entered she brings error. Of the 19 assignments those urged in the briefs and requiring notice may be thus stated: (1) The verdict is against the weight of the evidence; (2) exhibits C, I) and E were erroneously excluded; (3) certain testimony of the witness Jewett was erroneously…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hallack v. StockdaleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. City & County of Denver v. WillsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. In re Estate of HayesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  4. City & County of Denver v. MagivneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metter v. Los Angeles ExaminerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Ross v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. Ross v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API