Legal Opinion

Kuhl v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 29, 1986No. 3-85-0171WCPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kasserman

Petitioner, Betty J. Kuhl, has perfected this appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of La Salle County which refused to award her attorney fees and interest to which she claims she is entitled under sections 19(g) and 19(n) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 48, par. 138.19(g); Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 48, par. 138.19(n); Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 48, par. 138.19(n) (as amended by Pub. Act 83 — 1362)). The facts are as follows.

After an arbitrator found that the petitioner’s exposure to an occupational disease left her temporarily totally disabled, on September…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Noe v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wirth v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. FryeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Franklin v. Wellco CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  5. Smith v. Gen Co. Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Williams v. Illinois State Scholarship CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re the Proceeding Under AS 22.30.070(c) in Relation to JohnstoneAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bray v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Ballard v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Aper v. National Union Electric Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API